Posts Tagged ‘review’

Indy Grand Prix of Sonoma

Monday, September 5th, 2011

I recently attended the 2011 Indy Grand Prix of Sonoma at Infineon Raceway and was immediately struck by how different the experience was to the US Grand Prix at Indianapolis that I attended in 2002. This post is a quick recap of what I saw at Sonoma and why F1 needs to change and become more fan accessible.

I am a massive F1 fan and have missed watching only a handful of races since I started watching it in 1995. When I moved to the US in 2002 and got funding for my Masters degree the very first thing I did was start planning a trip to the 2002 US Grand Prix at Indianapolis. While it was a good race and a decent experience I was not particularly blown away by the live experience and decided at that point that it made more sense to watch the races on TV where you are way more comfortable and can follow much more of the race. Saving over a thousand dollars on tickets, hotels and airfare made it much easier decision as well. I instead spent my $$$ on track days, Lemons racing and making my annual visit top the Monterey Motorsports Reunion. This year though I attended the 2011 Indy Grand Prix of Sonoma at Infineon Raceway and was absolutely blown away by the fan friendliness of the event and have resolved to make this an annual event for me as well. The following is a quick recap of my experience at the event.

First off the tickets are significantly cheaper, since the race promoters don’t have to pay Bernie Ecclestones extortionist prices they are able to give the fans a much more reasonably priced experience. For just $109 I was able to purchase the Legends of Indycar package which included a reserved covered grand stand seat, garage pass, pit pass, Indycar legends Q & A session (Mario Andretti, Johnny Rutherford, Al Unser Jr) and free parking. Compared to the ~$200 it cost for just weekend grandstand tickets to the USGP 10 years ago it was an unbelievable bargain.

Takuma Sato / KV Racing

When I actually arrived at the track, I was amazed to see the main grandstand literally overlooks the pits (the pic above is from row 1 of the stands). Since I had gotten there a bit early I walked over to the garage area (Infineon Garages are about 30m away from the actual pits themselves). to have a look. All of the cars were lined up in front of the garages and the mechanics were waiting for the track to open before pulling them into the pits. The garage pass allowed me to walk through the entire area and the mechanics were happy to let the fans take/pose for as many pictures as they wanted. In addition the teams trailers were across from the garages and you could see the mechanics and drivers leaving after their morning briefing (that’s me with Takuma Sato below).

28082011401

Takuma Sato

After walking around the garages for a bit I decided to walk into the pits area to see what kind of access I had. Incredibly for just $109 my pit pass gave me full access to the pitlane for all of the morning events right up to 30 minutes before the actual race start. This meant I could watch the morning practice from the pit lane just 20 feet from the race cars and literally looking over the shoulders of the pit crew. Additionally the morning practice was delayed due to fog which meant that the drivers were also spending some time in the pits which led to a lot of photo and autograph opportunities. The drivers are very cool and were happily spending time talking to the fans that were in the pits. Taku had several Japanese fans following him around while Sebastien Bourdais was just wandering around the pits. While most of the drivers I saw were quite cool, I have to say that Dario Franchitti was being a bit of dick and intentionally avoided the fans who had queued up for his autograph after the session.

28082011406

Dario Franchitti

Eventually the practice did get underway and it way an amazing experience to be able to stand that close to the cars as they accelerate out of the puts and thunder through turn 1. You are close enough to feel the vibrations as they go past and see them bob over the bump at the exit of the turn. The pit lane experience by itself is enough to turn even the most casual of attendees into a hard core race fan.

Next was the Q&A session with the Indycar legends. Nothing particularly spectacular learned but it was great to see the friendships that still existed between the guys and also their memories of old races. I was able to get Marios autograph on the piston off his own Lotus 81.

Al Unser Jr, Mario Andretti & Johnny Rutherford

After the Q&A I went back to my seat and watched the Historic Grand Prix race. Ex-Lotus IMSA driver Doc Bundy was on pole in Marios Lotus 79 and ended up finishing in second place after a race-long battle with a Williams. The historic cars sounded great and the drivers were pushing quite hard for someone driving irreplaceable million dollar machines :) Click here to watch a quick video of the start of the race as well as the view from my grandstand seats.

After this there was about an hour long break which was filled in by an airshow by the Patriots Jet Team. Surprisingly this was the first airshow I was watching in the US and I have to say it was a lot of fun. It also fits in very well with the speed theme of the weekend and the hour in between just sped by. Special note of some of the crazy low passes that the pilots were making below the level of the grandstands.

Formation Loop

At this point I suddenly remembered that I needed to buy some gloves from Wine Country Motorsports which ended up taking a little longer than expected and I ended up missing the start of the race. On the way back to the stands I took a shortcut through the garage and ended up watching the first few laps from the windows at the back of the actual team garages – the clip below is the hairpin at the end of lap 1.

While it was an awesome location to watch the race from, the clip does show the problem with the Indycar race in general – there was absolutely no attempt at passing especially through the Turn 11 hairpin section (admittedly a different hairpin that NASCAR but still). I ended up watching 50 laps of the 75 laps of the race and I think I saw only one pass for position during that entire time and even that was on the big screen. Its pretty sad that 30 year old F1 cars put on a better show than the premiere american open wheel series on the very same track.

All in all while the main race itself was boring I had an awesome time at the event and I will definitely be coming back next year. Being in the thick of the action was a real eye opener and really gets you excited about the sport – I will actually watch the Indycar races on TV this year rather than immediately change the channel. What F1 really needs to understand is that by bringing fans closer to the action and getting the interaction with the drivers is the best way that you can grow the sports – no DRS required.

Circus before Dawn

Sunday, September 4th, 2011

I recently ran into David Miller, a longtime GGLC member and the newly published author of Circus before Dawn, a novel set in a fictional version of the 1999 Formula 1 season about an start-up F1 team based in the Bay Area. As soon as he told me the basic premise of the novel I knew I had to read it and now here is dust jacket description followed by my own review.

Shortly before the dawn of the new millennium, a video arrives at the postbox of internationally acclaimed motorsport journalist, Trevor Banks. The startling images depict the elite driving talents of an intriguing racecar driver.

Banks is assigned to investigate the story. As he does so, he discovers that the talented performer also has attracted the attention of a psychopathic saboteur. From Northern California’s legendary racetracks to multiple European venues, including the dazzling jewel that is the Monaco Grand Prix, the story takes the reader on a wild, unpredictable ride within the dangerous circus that is Formula One racing.

With an engaging style and a journalist’s sharp eye for detail, David Miller has crafted a compelling drama that hurtles toward its shocking climax with the purposefulness and hair-raising excitement of a Formula One racecar as it rockets toward the chequered flag.

As the cover says, Circus before Dawn is basically a thriller set in the world of F1. The entire book is told as a first person narrative from an F1 journalist who is suddenly thrust into added intrigue beyond the regular machinations of standard F1. My basic thoughts are as follows:

  • A good description of the F1 circuit for the casual reader along with many little details that an F1 fan will really like. Rather than glossing over the racing, the author actually explains many of the details about F1 (eg 107% rule, sponsorship, superlicense, etc…). The only slight fakery is the margins of some of the laptimes but that is something I can easily understand had to be enlarged for the regular audience
  • Excellent references to F1 history at various points in the book. They really show the authors involvement with F1 and actually got me to refer to wikipedia a few times while reading the book
  • Extra points for using Lotus as the premier marque during the book as well as talking about Laguna Seca and Infineon in great detail. Unlike most thriller I could actually visualize many of the action scenes in the book which made it more fun than the average thriller.
  • One issue with the explanations is that some of them do go a bit longer than needed and IMHO the book could have been trimmed by a good 50 pages
  • One of the things I loved about the book was that I actually personally know several people that are in the acknowledgements which was pretty cool. The author also gets extra points for mentioning the GGLC in the climactic scenes of the book.
  • I also really liked the idea of the F1 season ending with an F1 race through the streets of SF – too bad Bernie will never let that happen

All in all I have to say that it is a good book especially for the F1 fan and an excellent effort for the authors first book. I suggest you pick up a copy yourself while I look forward to reading the sequel and/or seeing the movie.

Spoilers: The following bits are spoilers which you should not read unless you have actually read the book. The author has done a great job moving very close to real events in F1 and these are just some of the things that came to my mind while reading the book:

  • The superlicence idea while a good idea is something that would never work in real life – exhibit A being Sebastien Loeb being denied a superlicense while being the 5 time defending World Rally Champion
  • The Grim Reaper campaigns reminded me of scenes from Mad Men where Draper talks about doing tobacco advertising about everyone dying
  • imagining Joe Saward, James Allen and all the other F1 journos as the protagonist :)
  • The Austrian flag bit from Imola 94 really hit a bit close to home especially since I had seen the Senna doc just a couple of weeks before
  • The orange track and Aurora loop were the only parts of the book where I felt the author went a little too crazy even for F1
  • The Bernie/Mosely show as an equivalent to the Xenon character in the book – its sad how those two managed to suck that much power under their control
  • Having spent the last weekend at the Indycar race and witnessed Danica mania first hand I do hope that the first woman in F1 be an actual talent like Michèle Mouton rather than a talentless publicity whore

Thoughts on “Senna”

Sunday, August 28th, 2011

Autographed by Asif Kapadia and Chris Dinnage

I recently had the chance to see a special pre-release screening of the Senna movie and since people have constantly been asking me for my opinion of it I figured its time to put my thoughts down on paper. Since the movie was shot entirely using archival footage it is being classified as a documentary though since there are no talking heads and only period accurate is used it can also be called a movie and depending on your point of view it has very different reviews

As a Movie
As a movie it is absolutely brilliant especially if you have limited knowledge of Ayrton. The director has done a masterfull job of weaving together clips from thousands of hours of FOM/Teleglobo/family/fan footage to create this powerful story of a brilliant driver fighting his way through F1. The movie has an excellent pacing and does not throw too many racing terms around which keeps the movie esy to understand for non-motorsports fans. The single most amazing thing for me is that he keeps you in your seats despite the fact you (the f1 fan) know exactly how the film will end. I highly recommend everyone watch this move and that you take all your non-racing friends to watch it as well.

As a Documentary
As a documentary though several of the movie strengths become immediate weaknesses. Chief among which is how the movie depicts Prost as a bad guy while Senna is shown as a pure but misunderstood genius. The truth as we all know is that Senna did plenty on unsavory things himself and many of his own peers did not like his driving style. Autosport recently posted a 1986 interview (subscription required) with Nigel Mansell where he says about Senna:

“Next time he does that, I won’t move. If he wants a very big accident… If he puts me in that position… All I will say is that I’m a driver, I’m a professional, I’m paid by my team to do my job, and if he wants to carry on being crazy, that’s up to him. At the moment I’m trying to avoid everything. I don’t want to get near him. I don’t really want to race with him. With Alain or with Keke, everybody I’ve known in F1, there’s never been a problem when you race properly together. But Senna has demonstrated to me that anyone who tried to overtake him he has complete disregard for, and he’ll knock them off the road if he has to.

“The other day I hard someone comparing him with Villeneuve, whom I knew very well, and it’s an insult to Gilles’ name to say that Senna is anything like the man he was. Gilles was a brilliant driver, but also a totally fair one.”

The film also misses several significant points in Sennas life which will annoy the F1 fan who is looking for a documentary experience. For eg:

  1. Stefan Bellof was catching Senna faster than Senna was catching Prost at Monaco 84
  2. Beating Prost by 1.4 sec in Monaco 88 qualifying
  3. Senna breaking the San Marino 89 agreement with Prost
  4. Senna generally putting people in the position to cause accidents. The Jackie Stewart interview clips begins to talk about it but they basically brush it away.

It also has relatively little actual track footage though I can understand why they would want to remove it from a film made for the mass market who dont necessarily appreciate the skill needed to lap Monaco.

Sum Up
All in all I think that if you approach this film as a movie you will have a great time and if you look at it as a documentary you will be disappointed. I’s suggest watching it on a big screen with some non-motorsports fans to get the full impact and experience of the movie. Also the director said that the DVD/Blu-Ray will have an extra hour of interview footage that is fairer to Prost and makes him look better than in the theatrical release. He also said to wait and purchase the british version of the movie since the current versions are in Portugese.

And as a final tidbit I’ll leave you with my recording of a 50 min Q&A session with director Asif Kapadia after the screening where he talks about how the movie came together including the process of shooting a movie with only archival footage, getting access to Bernies archive, showing the movie to the Senna family, extended footage in the DVD/Blu-Ray, writing the music before making the movie, etc…

Nokia N810 Tablet Review

Tuesday, August 19th, 2008

I am a big fan of the Nokia N800 and use it quite frequently as a video player and RSS reader when I am on the go. The addition of a slide-out keyboard for the Nokia N810 made it a very desirable device and I was very excited when the folks at WOM World lent me a test device to play with for a few weeks. As luck would have it, I got the device just before a short trip to Atlanta and so I decided to give the N810 a real work out to see if it could replace my laptop. So for the first time in years I left my laptop at home for a trip and exclusively used the N810 (paired with my 3G N95) for all my computing needs.

For those of you who are not familiar with the N810 it is basically an updated N800 with a built-in, slide-out keyboard. The other major differences were a fixed front facing camera (as opposed to the rotating one on the N800), built-in GPS, 2GB internal storage and a single miniSD slot (instead of the 2 regular SD slots). The buttons on the front have all been moved either into the slide or the top of the device making it look and more importantly feel a lot smaller than the N800 even though they have the same size screen.

In general the N810 performed very much like my N800 – the screen is very clear and the battery life is pretty good. The audio is decent enough and it is able to play most video format right out of the box. The GPS chip had adequate recption though I did have issues pre-downloading maptile data – it took multiple hours to download the eastern US (~700 MB) and in the end it failed sometime during the process. The built in browser was pretty decent and I was able to visit all of my usual websites and do all my email with no issues. It came very close to being a laptop except for two deal breakers which were unfortunately both associated with the new slide-out keyboard:

First off the keyboard is really hard to use. It requires a little too much pressure to register a key press and even worse it does not give adequate feedback when a key is pressed. This is especially difficult in central keys like R, T, G, etc… I found that I would have to press the key and then immediately look at the screen to see if the press had registered. Plus since you are only typing with your thumbs it means that touch typing is not an option and you will have to keep looking from the keyboard to the screen. However I am willing to give Nokia the benefit of the doubt on this one – it is possible that the device I got was bit defective due to heavy use (it had been used by other people in the WOM program) though I would still hope that a device like this should be able to go through heavy usage without issues.

The second and much more serious problem is the interaction between the the keyboard and the touchscreen. The screen is small enough that its really not practical to tap on web links with your fingers. This means that most navigation is done using the stylus which is similar to the N800 and works pretty well here as well. Similarly the keyboard works quite well (assuming your keyboard works better than mine) when you need to enter text. The real issue is when you have to do something that involves both navigation and text – it is extremely difficult to type on the keyboard while still holding the stylus in your fingers. The ideal position for typing on the device is to have both index fingers on the top edge of the device with both middle finger supporting the device from below – this leaves your thumbs free to type. However this position also means that the gap between your index and middle fingers is too large too easily grip the extremely thin stylus. You can try and wedge it against the side of the device itself but that puts pressure on your fingers which will start hurting pretty soon. You could try putting the stylus down down/away every time you type but that will become extremely tiresome. And finally the change in hand grip from one-handed(to point) to two handed(to type) every few minutes is quite annoying too. While the keyboard and stylus are good at their individual tasks they are just not designed to be used together which means that the N810 is actually harder to use that my original N800 with its stylus operated soft keyboard.

The touch screen is a nice interface for web browsing but as more and more information moves into the cloud, a tablet-class device must have adequate (and relatively seamless) text entry mechanisms as well. What Nokia really needs is a secondary (or in this case tertiary) input method such the blackberry scroll-wheels and trackballs that allow the users to use a mouse-like functionality without changing their grip on the device. The touch screen will continue to serve as the browsing interface but users will also be able to go into the text entry mode which allows them to enter text and move around the page without having to change their grip on the device. If Nokia is able to get this right the N810 will truly become a laptop replacement for short trips and vacations. However in its current state I would recommend that you go for the N800 instead – it is both cheaper and the soft keyboard is much easier to use.

Video chat on the Nokia N800 internet tablet (tutorial)

Wednesday, May 2nd, 2007

Update: The Internet Video Call application described in this post has been discontinued by Nokia and does not work any more. To do a video chat on the N800 please read my new tutorial on how to video chat using the Gizmo Project.

I recently attended Mobile Mashup 2007 and was thrilled to find that all attendees were being given an N800 Internet Tablet. I have been following the hype on the N800 for a while and while most people have been raving about it being the ultimate rss reader and the perfect coffee table web browser, I have intrigued by the video chat possibilities. Though voice and video chat are now supported by most of the major IM clients, the fact that it requires a computer, webcam and a headset means that you are pretty much anchored to one spot during the call – sure you could theoretically carry a laptop around the house but that’s too cumbersome to be done with any regularity. The N800 however comes with integrated speakers, mike, (VGA?) camera and WiFi which makes it the perfect untethered video chat appliance – in theory.

In practice I found that the N800 has a truly ridiculous user interface that does not adhere to any known UI standards. People will justify it by saying that it is running Linux and has an “expert” user interface (aka whatever the implementer felt was good), but that is no excuse for Nokia releasing it in its current state. If you are marketing a device to end users you have to make the software completely idiot proof. Sure I could download the source and make the modifications myself but the fact is that when I want to make a call all I want to do is talk to the other person – recompling linux is not an acceptable step during the calling process. Anyway, after about 3-4 hours of fiddling with the various options I was finally able to get the video chat to work and was quite impressed with the results. The audio quality is excellent and doesn’t have much lag. The video reception (see picture below) is pretty good though it is fairly low resolution. Remote users said that the camera on the N800 did not deal well with differential lighting/backlit conditions but that’s pretty much par for the course on a webcam. I was able to make video calls to friends in the US as well as to my parents in India (PC software is Windows only, Mac and Linux users are on their own). It’s pretty cool to be able to walk around the house while video chatting without worrying about power, network, camera, headset, etc… The fact that the screen and the camera are so close to each other means that the line of sight problem is minimized as well. The experience is similar to what I expect cellphone video calls to be like – if they were actually cheap enough to make. :-)

Since a bunch of us at the lab have this device we have been playing around with using it almost like the media spaces project. Shane and I sat at different ends of the room during the CHI Sampler and left the video channel open throughout (audio muted). It was quite interesting to be able to see other people reactions to the talks. Since there was no audio we had use an improvised sign language to communicate until Ayman came up with the idea of typing messages on your cellphone and then holding the phone screen up to the webcam. We also tried setting our devices to so both cameras would point to the speaker so we could see different points of view on a single talk. I don’t think this is something you will do often, but I can see it being a useful backchannel when non-colocated people are working together. The fact that it is a separate device makes it feel more like a real communication channel than the webcam window on a PC IM client.
Nokia N800 video call interface

N800 Video call tutorial

Now for the truly useful part of this post – a step by step tutorial on setting up video chat so that future buyers wont end up pulling their hair out. If you are not sure about what buttons I am referring to please click through onto the image above, I have marked out the important icons using Flickr notes.

Update the OS

Download the software update utility from Nokia and update the OS. The newest version of the OS is more stable than the one the N800 ships with. Dont forget to back up any existing data before the update.

Setup the WiFi

To make an internet video call you first need the internet, if you haven’t set it up during your first boot just follow these steps.

  1. Open the “Control Panel” from Start Button (the button on the left that has two window icons on it) -> Tools -> Control Panel
  2. Open the Connectivity application and click the “Connections” button
  3. Click “New” to open the connection setup wizard and then tap “Next” to continue
  4. Name the connection, set the connection type to “WLAN” and tap next
  5. You will get dialog asking “Scan for available WLAN networks?”. Tap Yes
  6. You will now be presented with a list of available networks. Just select the one you want to connect to and tap next. You will be prompted to enter the network WEP key if the network is protected.
  7. Tap “Finish” to save you new internet settings

Setup a Google Talk/Jabber account

In order to invite someone to start a video/voice chat with you you need to make them a contact. The easiest way to do this is to sign into an existing Google talk account since all that needs is a Gmail account and password.

  1. First go back to the control panel and open the “Accounts” application.
  2. Hit “New” to create a new account. Hit next once the Account Setup wizard opens.
  3. Select “Google Talk” as the service and tap Next. You should theoretically be able to do the same with any Jabber account but I have not tried this and YMMV.
  4. If you have an existing Google Talk account select that option or else select “create new account”. Tap Next to continue.
  5. Enter your username and passowrd before tapping Next.
  6. Hit “Finish” to complete account setup.
  7. If your account was setup correctly you should see a green ball icon to the right of the bluetooth icon on the status bar (top right of the screen).

Send call invitation

This is the step where you actually invite someone (on either a Windows PC or another N800) to join you in an internet call

  1. Start by opening the camera on the tablet. It is the little circle on the left edge of the tablet when you are looking at the screen. Push the circle with your finger and the camera should pop out. The internet call application will also open but you can close it for now.
  2. Click on the “Communication” icon on the left taskbar. It looks similar to the tray icon for MSN messenger and looks like two figures in pink and purple.
  3. Select “Send call invitation” from the menu.
  4. A dialog box will pop up asking you what name you want to use for you internet calls. Type in whatever screen name you would like to use.
  5. This will open a window asking how you want to send the invite. Select the “Send invitation via chat” option and tap “Ok”
  6. This will open the Instant Messaging application and will display a window asking you to “Select contact for invitation”. Select the contact you want to invite and tap “Ok”
  7. The IM application will open a chat window and send the other person a message saying “XXXX is inviting you to star an Internet video call (voice-only calling also supported). Click the following link for further instructions”.
  8. If the person you are calling has an N800 then they will get directly get an incoming call dialog which they can answer to start the call.
  9. If the remote person is on a Windows PC they should click on the which will take them to a page that looks like this. If the initial link was valid (it should have some url parameters) the “Install Software” button on the page will be in colour.
  10. When the remote user clicks on that button the user will be prompted to install the Nokia Internet call software. It is a 11 MB download and have the usual install screens, the user can just keept hitting next :-)
  11. Once the software is installed, the remote user should go back to the initial install page and click the “Add contact” button at the bottom of the second column. This button only appears on valid pages (it will not appear on the link on step 9) and only if the downloaded software is correctly installed.
  12. Once the remote user had clicked the “Add contact” button you should get an authorization request on the tablet. There will be an audio notification and the “Communication” button in the left taskbar will change colour to red and green. You can authorize the request by tapping the button and then selecting “Authorize XXX” option. You can also add the remote user as a contact by selecting the “Add XXX” option.
  13. Once the authorization is done you should get an “Incoming call” notification. Once you select the green telephone icon it will open an internet call between the you and the remote contact. If both users have a webcam it will have a video channel or else it will be a voice only call.

Once you have actually set up you first call everything else should go pretty smoothly. If you want to call someone you have spoken to before just open the Internet call application and pick them out of the recent calls list. The software does not show if a person currently has video call capability so you may occasionally find that someone who has switched to another PC may have to go through another invite/install process. The call application is a bit buggy and sometimes will not make outgoing call (you get an error message saying “unable to connect”), in this try asking the remote user to call you – that seems to always work for me. One last point is that because the internet call and IM clients are different applications you cannot see both screen at the same time making this a either a pure audio/video chat or a pure text chat – it isn’t too much of a loss because the text entry using the stylus is soooooo slow that you very quickly give up on the text chat.
If this has gotten you interested and you want to buy an N800 just head on over to the Nokia site.