Posts Tagged ‘review’

Nokia N810 Tablet Review

Tuesday, August 19th, 2008

I am a big fan of the Nokia N800 and use it quite frequently as a video player and RSS reader when I am on the go. The addition of a slide-out keyboard for the Nokia N810 made it a very desirable device and I was very excited when the folks at WOM World lent me a test device to play with for a few weeks. As luck would have it, I got the device just before a short trip to Atlanta and so I decided to give the N810 a real work out to see if it could replace my laptop. So for the first time in years I left my laptop at home for a trip and exclusively used the N810 (paired with my 3G N95) for all my computing needs.

For those of you who are not familiar with the N810 it is basically an updated N800 with a built-in, slide-out keyboard. The other major differences were a fixed front facing camera (as opposed to the rotating one on the N800), built-in GPS, 2GB internal storage and a single miniSD slot (instead of the 2 regular SD slots). The buttons on the front have all been moved either into the slide or the top of the device making it look and more importantly feel a lot smaller than the N800 even though they have the same size screen.

In general the N810 performed very much like my N800 – the screen is very clear and the battery life is pretty good. The audio is decent enough and it is able to play most video format right out of the box. The GPS chip had adequate recption though I did have issues pre-downloading maptile data – it took multiple hours to download the eastern US (~700 MB) and in the end it failed sometime during the process. The built in browser was pretty decent and I was able to visit all of my usual websites and do all my email with no issues. It came very close to being a laptop except for two deal breakers which were unfortunately both associated with the new slide-out keyboard:

First off the keyboard is really hard to use. It requires a little too much pressure to register a key press and even worse it does not give adequate feedback when a key is pressed. This is especially difficult in central keys like R, T, G, etc… I found that I would have to press the key and then immediately look at the screen to see if the press had registered. Plus since you are only typing with your thumbs it means that touch typing is not an option and you will have to keep looking from the keyboard to the screen. However I am willing to give Nokia the benefit of the doubt on this one – it is possible that the device I got was bit defective due to heavy use (it had been used by other people in the WOM program) though I would still hope that a device like this should be able to go through heavy usage without issues.

The second and much more serious problem is the interaction between the the keyboard and the touchscreen. The screen is small enough that its really not practical to tap on web links with your fingers. This means that most navigation is done using the stylus which is similar to the N800 and works pretty well here as well. Similarly the keyboard works quite well (assuming your keyboard works better than mine) when you need to enter text. The real issue is when you have to do something that involves both navigation and text – it is extremely difficult to type on the keyboard while still holding the stylus in your fingers. The ideal position for typing on the device is to have both index fingers on the top edge of the device with both middle finger supporting the device from below – this leaves your thumbs free to type. However this position also means that the gap between your index and middle fingers is too large too easily grip the extremely thin stylus. You can try and wedge it against the side of the device itself but that puts pressure on your fingers which will start hurting pretty soon. You could try putting the stylus down down/away every time you type but that will become extremely tiresome. And finally the change in hand grip from one-handed(to point) to two handed(to type) every few minutes is quite annoying too. While the keyboard and stylus are good at their individual tasks they are just not designed to be used together which means that the N810 is actually harder to use that my original N800 with its stylus operated soft keyboard.

The touch screen is a nice interface for web browsing but as more and more information moves into the cloud, a tablet-class device must have adequate (and relatively seamless) text entry mechanisms as well. What Nokia really needs is a secondary (or in this case tertiary) input method such the blackberry scroll-wheels and trackballs that allow the users to use a mouse-like functionality without changing their grip on the device. The touch screen will continue to serve as the browsing interface but users will also be able to go into the text entry mode which allows them to enter text and move around the page without having to change their grip on the device. If Nokia is able to get this right the N810 will truly become a laptop replacement for short trips and vacations. However in its current state I would recommend that you go for the N800 instead – it is both cheaper and the soft keyboard is much easier to use.

  • Share/Bookmark

Video chat on the Nokia N800 internet tablet (tutorial)

Wednesday, May 2nd, 2007

Update: The Internet Video Call application described in this post has been discontinued by Nokia and does not work any more. To do a video chat on the N800 please read my new tutorial on how to video chat using the Gizmo Project.

I recently attended Mobile Mashup 2007 and was thrilled to find that all attendees were being given an N800 Internet Tablet. I have been following the hype on the N800 for a while and while most people have been raving about it being the ultimate rss reader and the perfect coffee table web browser, I have intrigued by the video chat possibilities. Though voice and video chat are now supported by most of the major IM clients, the fact that it requires a computer, webcam and a headset means that you are pretty much anchored to one spot during the call – sure you could theoretically carry a laptop around the house but that’s too cumbersome to be done with any regularity. The N800 however comes with integrated speakers, mike, (VGA?) camera and WiFi which makes it the perfect untethered video chat appliance – in theory.

In practice I found that the N800 has a truly ridiculous user interface that does not adhere to any known UI standards. People will justify it by saying that it is running Linux and has an “expert” user interface (aka whatever the implementer felt was good), but that is no excuse for Nokia releasing it in its current state. If you are marketing a device to end users you have to make the software completely idiot proof. Sure I could download the source and make the modifications myself but the fact is that when I want to make a call all I want to do is talk to the other person – recompling linux is not an acceptable step during the calling process. Anyway, after about 3-4 hours of fiddling with the various options I was finally able to get the video chat to work and was quite impressed with the results. The audio quality is excellent and doesn’t have much lag. The video reception (see picture below) is pretty good though it is fairly low resolution. Remote users said that the camera on the N800 did not deal well with differential lighting/backlit conditions but that’s pretty much par for the course on a webcam. I was able to make video calls to friends in the US as well as to my parents in India (PC software is Windows only, Mac and Linux users are on their own). It’s pretty cool to be able to walk around the house while video chatting without worrying about power, network, camera, headset, etc… The fact that the screen and the camera are so close to each other means that the line of sight problem is minimized as well. The experience is similar to what I expect cellphone video calls to be like – if they were actually cheap enough to make. :-)

Since a bunch of us at the lab have this device we have been playing around with using it almost like the media spaces project. Shane and I sat at different ends of the room during the CHI Sampler and left the video channel open throughout (audio muted). It was quite interesting to be able to see other people reactions to the talks. Since there was no audio we had use an improvised sign language to communicate until Ayman came up with the idea of typing messages on your cellphone and then holding the phone screen up to the webcam. We also tried setting our devices to so both cameras would point to the speaker so we could see different points of view on a single talk. I don’t think this is something you will do often, but I can see it being a useful backchannel when non-colocated people are working together. The fact that it is a separate device makes it feel more like a real communication channel than the webcam window on a PC IM client.
Nokia N800 video call interface

N800 Video call tutorial

Now for the truly useful part of this post – a step by step tutorial on setting up video chat so that future buyers wont end up pulling their hair out. If you are not sure about what buttons I am referring to please click through onto the image above, I have marked out the important icons using Flickr notes.

Update the OS

Download the software update utility from Nokia and update the OS. The newest version of the OS is more stable than the one the N800 ships with. Dont forget to back up any existing data before the update.

Setup the WiFi

To make an internet video call you first need the internet, if you haven’t set it up during your first boot just follow these steps.

  1. Open the “Control Panel” from Start Button (the button on the left that has two window icons on it) -> Tools -> Control Panel
  2. Open the Connectivity application and click the “Connections” button
  3. Click “New” to open the connection setup wizard and then tap “Next” to continue
  4. Name the connection, set the connection type to “WLAN” and tap next
  5. You will get dialog asking “Scan for available WLAN networks?”. Tap Yes
  6. You will now be presented with a list of available networks. Just select the one you want to connect to and tap next. You will be prompted to enter the network WEP key if the network is protected.
  7. Tap “Finish” to save you new internet settings

Setup a Google Talk/Jabber account

In order to invite someone to start a video/voice chat with you you need to make them a contact. The easiest way to do this is to sign into an existing Google talk account since all that needs is a Gmail account and password.

  1. First go back to the control panel and open the “Accounts” application.
  2. Hit “New” to create a new account. Hit next once the Account Setup wizard opens.
  3. Select “Google Talk” as the service and tap Next. You should theoretically be able to do the same with any Jabber account but I have not tried this and YMMV.
  4. If you have an existing Google Talk account select that option or else select “create new account”. Tap Next to continue.
  5. Enter your username and passowrd before tapping Next.
  6. Hit “Finish” to complete account setup.
  7. If your account was setup correctly you should see a green ball icon to the right of the bluetooth icon on the status bar (top right of the screen).

Send call invitation

This is the step where you actually invite someone (on either a Windows PC or another N800) to join you in an internet call

  1. Start by opening the camera on the tablet. It is the little circle on the left edge of the tablet when you are looking at the screen. Push the circle with your finger and the camera should pop out. The internet call application will also open but you can close it for now.
  2. Click on the “Communication” icon on the left taskbar. It looks similar to the tray icon for MSN messenger and looks like two figures in pink and purple.
  3. Select “Send call invitation” from the menu.
  4. A dialog box will pop up asking you what name you want to use for you internet calls. Type in whatever screen name you would like to use.
  5. This will open a window asking how you want to send the invite. Select the “Send invitation via chat” option and tap “Ok”
  6. This will open the Instant Messaging application and will display a window asking you to “Select contact for invitation”. Select the contact you want to invite and tap “Ok”
  7. The IM application will open a chat window and send the other person a message saying “XXXX is inviting you to star an Internet video call (voice-only calling also supported). Click the following link for further instructions”.
  8. If the person you are calling has an N800 then they will get directly get an incoming call dialog which they can answer to start the call.
  9. If the remote person is on a Windows PC they should click on the which will take them to a page that looks like this. If the initial link was valid (it should have some url parameters) the “Install Software” button on the page will be in colour.
  10. When the remote user clicks on that button the user will be prompted to install the Nokia Internet call software. It is a 11 MB download and have the usual install screens, the user can just keept hitting next :-)
  11. Once the software is installed, the remote user should go back to the initial install page and click the “Add contact” button at the bottom of the second column. This button only appears on valid pages (it will not appear on the link on step 9) and only if the downloaded software is correctly installed.
  12. Once the remote user had clicked the “Add contact” button you should get an authorization request on the tablet. There will be an audio notification and the “Communication” button in the left taskbar will change colour to red and green. You can authorize the request by tapping the button and then selecting “Authorize XXX” option. You can also add the remote user as a contact by selecting the “Add XXX” option.
  13. Once the authorization is done you should get an “Incoming call” notification. Once you select the green telephone icon it will open an internet call between the you and the remote contact. If both users have a webcam it will have a video channel or else it will be a voice only call.

Once you have actually set up you first call everything else should go pretty smoothly. If you want to call someone you have spoken to before just open the Internet call application and pick them out of the recent calls list. The software does not show if a person currently has video call capability so you may occasionally find that someone who has switched to another PC may have to go through another invite/install process. The call application is a bit buggy and sometimes will not make outgoing call (you get an error message saying “unable to connect”), in this try asking the remote user to call you – that seems to always work for me. One last point is that because the internet call and IM clients are different applications you cannot see both screen at the same time making this a either a pure audio/video chat or a pure text chat – it isn’t too much of a loss because the text entry using the stylus is soooooo slow that you very quickly give up on the text chat.
If this has gotten you interested and you want to buy an N800 just head on over to the Nokia site.

  • Share/Bookmark

The Tesla Roadster – the perfect Elise?

Tuesday, February 20th, 2007

I had the opportunity to visit Tesla Motors on a tour organized by SFF1 and would like to write up some of my thoughts about the company, its technology and their first car. This is going to be from the point of view of a petrol head engineer who daily drives an Elise – take it how you will :-) .

In case you haven’t heard of Tesla, on account of the rock you have been living under for the last 6 months, it is a Bay Area automotive startup that is designing and building the Tesla Roadster which will be the worlds first mass produced electric sports car. I have been especially interested in the Tesla since it based on the Lotus Elise chassis and is in fact assembled by Lotus in Hethel in an arrangement similar to that used on the Opel Speedster/Vauxhall VX200. However unlike the Opel/Vauxhall, which were more like badge engineered Elises, the Tesla uses a substantially modified Elise chassis with an all-electric powertrain and is a whole new beast. I had already had my first look at the car during the Palo Alto British car meet but this tour was a chance to actually look at the car internals and to talk to some of the people behind this revolutionary machine.

The most important piece of new technology in the car is of course its electric powertrain. Unlike established car companies which are have a “not invented here” complex and prefer to develop their cars from scratch, Tesla followed a startup mentality and tried to source as much of the technology as they could. The most obvious example of this is in the way they created the battery pack for the car. Instead of trying to come up with new battery technology, they instead sourced the fastest growing battery technology available today – the Lithium Ion batteries used in notebook computers. They use 6831 off-the shelf Li-Ion cells to form a 50 kW battery pack that provide the power for everything on the car. For those of you who are worried about exploding batteries – Tesla uses a lot more battery management technology including a heating/cooling system that keeps the batteries at their optimum operating temperature irrespective of the outside temperature.

Lithium - Ion batteryTesla Battery pack

The electric motor spins up to 13,500 rpm and produces 248 bhp and 200 ft/lbs of torque while weighing just 125 lbs. The most startling thing about the torque is that you have maximum torque starting from 0 rpm all the way to 6000 rpm where it starts to slowly reduce. The entire powertrain has only 17 moving parts of which 15 are in the gearbox which is a clutchless 2 speed setup where 1st will take you to almost 70 while 2nd tops out at 130 mph. There is no reverse gear – the motor (which has just 1 moving part, the rotor) just spins backwards when you want to reverse.

Following the technology sourcing mindset further, Tesla sourced the entire chassis from Lotus. By doing this they not only got one of the best handling chassis in the world but they also gained instant credibility by partnering with a 7 time F1 world champion constructor. The bonded aluminium chassis is a modified version of the Elise chassis and the front half looks to be identical to that of the Elise. The side sills have been lowered 50 mm to enable (relatively) easy ingress/egress which should make the Tesla more livable than the Elise. The rear subframe has been modified to hold the battery pack (900 lbs) and the motor (125 lbs) in the same position as the Elise engine to get similar handling characteristics. Following the Chapman philosophy of “simplify and add lightness”, Tesla has gone to great lengths to lower the weight and uses an all carbon fiber body to keep the weight down to 2500 lbs. The front suspension is identical to the base Elise except for the use of the AP Racing ‘big brake’ kit to handle the added weight of the Tesla.

Tesla Roadster chassis

The performance figures on the Tesla Roadster are pretty amazing:

  • 248 bhp
  • 0-60 in 4 seconds
  • Top speed of 130 mph
  • 250 mile range
  • CO2 emissions equivalent to 135 mpg
  • Zero maintenance (The lack of moving parts means that the only mainteneace needed is a brake fluid change every 3 years)

Tesla as an Elise replacement

As you can see from the pictures, the Tesla looks very similar to the Elise and makes many of the same compromises. The end result is however quite different and while not as focussed as the Elise it can actually be a better alternative for many owners. I see the following pros and cons while comparing the Tesla with the Elise:

Pros

1) General livability: The Tesla beats the Elise hands down when it comes to general livability. Ingress/egress is a lot easier and the car comes with a lot more features like satnav and heated seats. The quietness of the electric motor will make it a lot less tiring to drive.

2) Performance: The massive torque of the Tesla means that you no longer have to wait for the second cam before being able to pass someone. Its handling will probably be not as pure as the Elise but I am confident that Tesla and Lotus will bring out a great handling car.

3) Urethane bumpers: The Tesla has urethane bumpers which should keep the car safer from braille parkers – the Elise owners cracked clamshell nightmare should become a thing of the past.

4) Even more exclusive than the Elise: The Tesla will be even more exclusive than the Elise – while I don’t care about this particular point I will admit that there are people out there who prefer exclusive cars

5) Sticking it to Prius owners: You can tell the “holier than thou” Prius owners to go screw themselves because their car is slow gas guzzling piece of crap. The Tesla is a near supercar that appeals to both car enthusiasts and environmentalists.

Cons

1) Price: ~$90k is a lot of money especially when you can get a Noble for the same money. The initial buyers will be buying the Tesla for electric car bragging rights just as much as its ability as a sports car.

2) Need a second car: The low range of the Tesla means that it can never be your only car – you can daily drive it but you need to have a backup car in case you need to make the round trip. This shouldn’t be too much of a problem since the average Elise owner only puts a few thousand miles a year on his/her car – my 20+k a year are an exception

3) Top speed of 130: The top speed of the Tesla is only a 130 miles an hour which prevents it from entering true performance car territory, but honestly how many people very actually get their car past 130 on the public roads? The better torque and passing ability of the Tesla should make it the more practical car on the street.

4) Looks: Informally talking to the people at the tour most people felt that the Elise looked a lot more exotic than the Elise. I think this was only an issue because the two cars were next to each other, the average lay person will still confuse the Tesla with a Ferrari.

5) No track days for you: The range of the Tesla really prevents you from tracking your car (unless you have your own private track in your back yard). One of the greatest selling points of the Elise/Exige is the ability to drive the car to a track, flog it for a few hours and then drive it back with now problems whatsoever. Since the my nearest track is over a 100 miles away this makes it a real deal breaker for me – there is no way I can justify spending $90k on a performance car that I can never track.

In conclusion I can say that the Tesla is more accessible to the general public and they will be selling them as fast as they can make them. It may not meet my needs in car but I will definitely recommend it to people who are looking for a fun second car with no track aspirations. It is an amazing car and real technological triumph – an electric car that can thrill you with absolute performance while still making you feel good about saving baby seals.

For more pictures from the Tesla tour (including more pics with my Elise) visit my Flickr photo set.

Cross posted on EliseTalk

  • Share/Bookmark